Trans Mountain, pipelines dominate opening of Alberta legislature sitting

Opposition United Conservative Leader Jason Kenney accused Premier Rachel Notley's government of failing Alberta.

October 30, 2018   by Dean Bennett

Alberta Premier Rachel Notley. PHOTO:Premier of Alberta/Flickr

EDMONTON—Alberta’s politicians returned to the legislature Monday and picked up right where they left off in the spring by bashing each other over pipelines.

Opposition United Conservative Leader Jason Kenney accused Premier Rachel Notley’s government of failing Alberta on the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion, the carbon tax and Bill C-69, which is before the Senate and would change how energy projects are assessed and approved.

Related: Alberta’s Notley announces candidacy, slams Kenney in speech to NDP members [Canadian Manufacturing]

“Instead of following, why doesn’t this government lead in fighting for Alberta jobs and resources?” said Kenney, who led off the first question period of the six-week fall sitting.

Notley replied that Kenney “is absolutely entitled to his own opinions but he is absolutely not entitled to his own facts.”

“The facts are that our government has been fighting with respect to Bill C-69 for well over a year. The facts are that since we’ve been elected, we’ve done nothing but advocate for the Trans Mountain pipeline (and other projects).”

The pipeline project, approved by the federal government in 2016 but stalled ever since by permit delays and court rulings, has been the focus of legislature debate in 2018.

With a provincial election coming in the spring, Kenney’s United Conservatives have seized on the project as a symbol of Notley’s inability to advance Alberta’s core industry, despite seeking “social licence” by imposing a carbon tax on heating bills and gasoline.

Notley has challenged Kenney’s criticism, noting the federal Conservative government he was previously a part of failed to get a pipeline to any coast.

The debate continued following question period on Monday when the Speaker and members of the house agreed to a United Conservative motion calling for an emergency legislature debate on moving Trans Mountain along.

“We have gone through a history during this process with this current (NDP) government … getting this wrong repeatedly,” United Conservative house leader Jason Nixon said in debate. “This government continues to sit on their hands most of the time.”

Trans Mountain would triple the capacity of an existing line to get more Alberta oil to tankers on the B.C. coast and from there to Asian markets.

At present, almost all Alberta oil is earmarked for U.S. markets and, because of a captive market and limited pipeline access, it is selling at a deeply discounted rate.

Trans Mountain was poised to move ahead in the summer after the federal government stepped in to buy it. But it got bogged down in late August when the Federal Court of Appeal ruled more consultation with First Nations would have to be done along with greater study of the impact of increased tanker traffic.

Government house leader Brian Mason said 12 bills are to be introduced during the sitting, which is to run until the first week of December.

Bills to improve accessibility to post-secondary education and to modernize securities regulations were introduced in the house Monday.

Mason said there also will be legislation giving medical professions more power to sanction members for abusive acts, sexual or otherwise, toward patients.

There will be a bill to further implement recommendations of a multi-party panel on child intervention services.

A report on how municipalities are operating and benefiting from photo radar is also expected.

Print this page

Related Stories

1 Comment » for Trans Mountain, pipelines dominate opening of Alberta legislature sitting
  1. Darrell Cusack says:

    Why are we told lie after lie we are sending bitumen which is oil sand (formally call tar sands) natural gas and chemicals.(to make if flow). This mixture is highly volatile, toxic and a disaster waiting to happen when there is a spill or pipe line breech. Why not refine these products here we are capable, there is a refinery north of Edmonton that has a coke-er which you need to refine bitumen. Would this not create more jobs and we would have more control of are resources. Note the more bitumen is refined the more environmental friendly it becomes. One more note when we send it (bitumen) to the western US or Asia what happen then? I am guessing they will refine it turn it into oil use the natural gas (like we could have done) then send it back as products or oil? This makes sense to me?
    Though the eyes of the wold Canada is looked as a natural resources country. Please come and get what you want and we will give it to them, not only do we give it to them but these large company’s now are foreign owned. On another note are products are land locked but there is three major natural gas pipe lines going form Alberta to (I believe) there is two 36″ high pressure pipe lines going to California and one 48″ going to Ontario/Quebec and oil pipe line going to the US and Burnaby BC. They (the media) are saying are products are land locked and that is why we don’t get the value we should. So from this statement this implies, than we build this pipe line then, oil/bitumen is not land locked any more? I just think there is a possibility that we are not told the facts? Now are government buys a pipe line. I guessing what will happen they (tax payers) will build it then once it is up are running, it will be sold to one of the company’s (foreign) that donated the most money to the next government who is in power. My opinions Darrell

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *