Higher costs should kill Trans Mountain pipeline: Bloc, NDP, Greens

A Nanos survey shows respondents are increasingly uncomfortable spending public money to continue the project.

OTTAWA — Opposition parties and environmental groups are urging the federal government to stop expanding the Trans Mountain pipeline, citing a poll saying Canadians are alarmed by the project’s cost.

Bloc Quebecois leader Yves-Francois Blanchet, NDP environment critic Laurel Collins, as well as the Greens’ parliamentary leader Elizabeth May and environment activists Alexandra Woodsworth and Patrick Bonin, held a news conference Wednesday morning to release a Nanos poll of 1,003 Canadians that asked numerous questions about the project and its costs.

The federal government bought the existing oil pipeline between Alberta and the BC coast, and an unfinished plan to twin it, for $4.5 billion in 2018. The latest tally says the total cost to complete the twinning project will be $12.6 billion, much higher than a previous $7.4-billion estimate.

“If there is no profit to be made in the future, if we are going to have trouble finding buyers, we still have the opportunity to save these billions and invest in renewable energies, invest in these families struggling in Western Canada, rather than losing billions of dollars supporting a white elephant in the future,” said Woodsworth, a campaigner for B.C.-based environmental group Dogwood.

The Liberals under Prime Minister Justin Trudeau stepped in with public money when the company driving the project, Kinder Morgan, found the regulatory obstacles and legal challenges posed too much of a risk.

Some of those hurdles have since been cleared and the government says it intends to sell the completed pipeline at a profit once it’s done, reinvesting the proceeds into fighting climate change. Trans Mountain Corp., the federally owned company handling the project, has spent $2.5 billion to manage the impacts of delays and the resulting additional regulatory process. An additional $8.4 billion in expected expenses remain to complete the project, as well as $1.7 billion in finance charges.

According to the Nanos poll, only 16% of respondents agreed that the government should spend whatever it costs to complete the project. 43% said it should cost Canadian taxpayers nothing; 21% said taxpayers should fund the currently expected completion costs.

But also according to Nanos, just 17% of respondents said the government should cancel the twinning and write off the sunk costs. 40% said it should sell the pipeline for whatever it can get now; 33% said the project should continue with public money.

And 47% of respondents said Canada and the world need resource projects such as the pipeline to create jobs, versus 43% who said such projects should be halted because of their effect on climate change. 10% were unsure. That finding was consistent in every region of Canada except Quebec.

Nanos said the poll, conducted between Jan. 27 and 29, has a margin of error of 3.1 percentage points, 19 times out of 20.

According to Bonin, of Greenpeace, “it is very clear that this project will have no buyer.” He asked that the government stop the project.

“If the government insists on wanting to move forward, at least, that all the information be on the table so that Canadians and Quebecers understand that more than $12 billion must be currently put in and we’re all going to pay out of our pockets,” he said.

News from © Canadian Press Enterprises Inc. 2016
1 Comment » for Higher costs should kill Trans Mountain pipeline: Bloc, NDP, Greens
  1. John Doak says:

    Once again the doomsday route to perdition to all humanity in the long run seems inevitable, if we do NOT heed and act on the thousands of SCIENTISTS who have been warning us for decades about the need, not only to keep the temperature down but to ALSO to REDUCE not increase resource consumption. Politicians should be guided by science, not scientists squelched by (eg Trump) and populist (and mis-informed) sentiment.
    Government should stop subsidizing ANY polluting or resource industries, as well as discourage, not finance- more and more and more children, The entire planet needs to become truly- United Nations in the fight for long term survival, resources, (metals, minerals, water, clean air, and yes… oil/coal (as a petro-chemical feedstock).
    Name me ONE of the hundreds of astro/cosmo-nauts who have returned from gazing down on “home” and think anything OTHER than the foregoing… should be the way forward.
    Our entire businesses recyle by repairs and reusing valuable productions equipment and real estate. We ALL should do similarly whenever possible.
    PS. IF . . . oil/gas must be transported, it should be by the lowest environmentally sound method, until it can be synthesized or bio-replaced, and that- closest to the point of consumption, rather than around the country (or world)!

Have your say:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *