Congress bans import of forced labour products

A loophole in an 85-year-old tariff law has failed to keep products of forced and child labour out of America.

February 16, 2016   by The Associated Press

WASHINGTON — A bill headed for President Barack Obama this week includes a provision that would ban US imports of fish caught by slaves in Southeast Asia, gold mined by children in Africa and garments sewn by abused women in Bangladesh, closing a loophole in an 85-year-old tariff law that has failed to keep products of forced and child labour out of America.

An expose by The Associated Press last year found Thai companies ship seafood to the US that was caught and processed by trapped and enslaved workers. AP tracked fish and shrimp from people locked in cages and factories to supply chains of top retailers and restaurants, from supermarket chains like Wal-Mart and Whole Foods to restaurants including Red Lobster. The companies all said they strongly condemn labour abuse and are taking steps to prevent it.

As a result of the reports, more than 2,000 trapped fishermen have been freed, more than a dozen alleged traffickers arrested and millions of dollars worth of seafood and vessels seized. Thai Union, one of the world’s biggest seafood exporters, says it has hired 1,200 workers from outsourced shrimp processing sheds into safer, more closely regulated in-house jobs with decent pay.

On Capitol Hill, the AP investigation, along with other press reports and political advocacy, helped pressure lawmakers “to finally strike this obscene provision of US law,” said Sen. Ron Wyden, an Oregon democrat.

“It’s an outrage this loophole persisted for so long. No product made by people held against their will, or by children, should ever be imported to the United States,” he said.

The change is part of a wide-ranging bill which revamps trade laws and bars Internet taxes passed on a vote of 75-20 by the Senate Thursday. President Barack Obama is expected to sign it.

The US Tariff Act of 1930 gave Customs and Border Protection the authority to seize shipments where forced labour is suspected and block further imports. However, it has been used only 39 times in 85 years in large part because of an exemption that said goods made by children, prisoners or slaves can be allowed into the US if consumer demand cannot be met without them. Drafted during the Depression, lawmakers at the time placed economic need over foreign labour rights, according to legal historians.

If signed by President Obama, imports of a Labor Department list of more than 350 goods produced by child or forced labour – cotton from Kazakhstan, wheat from Pakistan, lobsters from Honduras – may now face federal law enforcement.

David Olave, a Washington DC-based trade consultant, said he’s concerned about unfair and overreaching seizures by Customs and Border Protection investigators who would be hard pressed to prove a product in a particular shipping container was picked or processed by a forced labourer. And he said US firms have already been proactive in trying to keep labour abuse out of their supply chains, well ahead of government regulations.

“From my perspective, this is more of an image issue,” he said, “It looks bad, to have a law that says we want to stop child labour, unless we really need it. It might have sounded ok in 1930 but it doesn’t sound good today.”

While Customs would be responsible for stopping items at ports of entry, Homeland Security Investigations agents in 46 countries would be responsible for the investigation of illicit trade.

David Abramowitz, who advocated for the change as vice-president of Humanity United, said the federal government will need to dedicate the resources to make sure the law is now properly enforced.

“We in civil society will have to be vigilant so that these reforms really lead to ensuring that US markets are not open to goods made with modern slavery,” he said.

© 2016 The Canadian Press

Print this page

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *