Subscribe
PLANT

Liberals defend Hydro One sale they opposed when PCs tried it

Premier Wynne claims privatizing 60% of the utility would raise $9 billion for provincial infrastructure development.


September 16, 2015
by The Canadian Press

TORONTO — Ontario’s Liberals were forced Sept. 15 to explain why they want to sell Hydro One after condemning the previous Progressive Conservative government for proposing a similar privatization plan.

The Conservatives dug up a 2002 motion from veteran Liberal Jim Bradley, now the chair of cabinet, that said Hydro One “is best kept in public ownership and public hands.” The motion was supported at the time by several Liberals who are members of Premier Kathleen Wynne’s cabinet.

“They were selling 100% with no conditions placed on it at all when those comments were made,” Bradley said. “It’s pretty sad when they have to go far back in history to deal with those things, but it’s all part of politics.”

Bradley cited cabinet confidentiality when asked if he had ever spoken against Premier Kathleen Wynne’s plans to sell 60% of the giant transmission utility to raise an estimated $9 billion.

“I always support government policy,” he said.

Wynne has pledged to use $4 billion from the sale to help pay for a $130-billion, 10-year infrastructure and public transit program, and $5 billion to pay down hydro debt.

“It is critical that we invest in the roads and the bridges and the other large infrastructure across the province that is needed by communities in order for them to be able to thrive,” she told the legislature.

Wynne said unlike the old Tory privatization proposal, the Liberal plan will see taxpayers remain as the largest single shareholder of Hydro One.

“It was extremely important for the government and the people of Ontario to retain 40% ownership, making sure we retained control of the board…and making sure that no entity could own more than 10%.”

Wynne also raised the issue of the Conservatives’ decision to privatize Highway 407 just before the 1999 election to help balance the province’s books, which critics say cost taxpayers millions of dollars in lost revenues.

“One of the guiding principles that we held on to as we went into this process was that we would not do what had been done by that party with the 407,” she said.

New PC Leader Patrick Brown warned that “anyone who sells one of their largest revenue tools is headed toward bankruptcy.”

Brown said he won’t be tied to positions taken by previous PC leaders, and warned that privatizing Hydro One will drive up electricity rates and remove oversight at the utility by the provincial ombudsman.

“The premier has lost the trust of families in Ontario because of her fire sale of Hydro One,” he said. “By turning her back on independent oversight, the premier has lost the province’s trust.”

The New Democrats have consistently opposed any move to privatize Hydro One, and dismissed Wynne’s explanation about needing money from the sale to invest in infrastructure.

“It must be sadly embarrassing to be the only premier in the history of this province who can’t keep Hydro One public while at the same time investing in infrastructure for the people of Ontario,” said NDP Leader Andrea Horwath.

© 2015 The Canadian Press

2 Comments » for Liberals defend Hydro One sale they opposed when PCs tried it
  1. Kathy Nadeau says:

    Wynn should never have been elected had the people at time of elections not being so scared of loosing their jobs wynn would not have been elected. To me she has no clue on how to run a province or take care of financial matters it showed with all the
    money the liberals have cost ontario people please do not elect Trudeau or Wynn will have more power we as ontarian’s have screwed up royaly by electing this power hungry person and I am being kind with my words

  2. Deniz Yazici says:

    The conservatives broke Ontario Hydro which was working – “if it ain’t broken, don’t fix it!” is my motto. Mike Harris didn’t listen to all those warnings from California regarding deregulation of the electricity market – then the Enron debaucle happened after Harris ignored the warnings. California was generating electricity that was going out of state and bouncing from state to state increasing in price multiple times (I believe it was 7 times the original price) before it got back to California – all engineered by Enron to increase profits. Dalton McGuinty was no better with his FIT program to “green” the electricity market – this cost Ontario more jobs as industry threw in the towel because electricity rates were soaring – even though labour rates were declining and were just becoming competitive. Now Wynn is messing with the broken system to break it even more – once it is privatized, profits will come first – at the expense of Ontarians. This is crazy policy. Wynn will not get my vote in the next election (nor will the conservatives) – I guarantee you that much. I am sick and tired of career politicians meddling with systems that were established so long ago and are / were working until they decided they needed to mess with it – without real world experience in running a business.

Have your say:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*